The News: Steam AI disclosure rules got a major rewrite in January 2026. Valve now says AI tools used to help build games (like code assistants and debugging software) don’t need to be disclosed at all. But if AI creates content you actually see, hear, or interact with in the game? That still needs a label.
I’ve been following AI’s creep into gaming for a while now. When Valve first added AI disclosure requirements back in 2024, the rules felt a bit vague. Did using an AI research assistant to look up game lore count? What about AI code completion in your IDE? The line was fuzzy.
This update draws a much clearer line, and honestly, it makes sense.
What Actually Changed in Steam AI Disclosure Rules
Valve now splits AI usage into two disclosure categories (pre-generated assets and live-generated content) while exempting developer efficiency tools like code assistants and debugging software entirely.
Valve split AI usage into two buckets that need disclosure, and carved out a third category that doesn’t.
Here’s the breakdown:
AI That Needs Disclosure
Pre-generated AI content: This covers any assets created with AI tools that ship with the game files. Think AI-generated textures, character art made in Midjourney, voice lines created with AI synthesis, or lore written by an LLM. If it’s baked into the game when you download it, developers need to flag it.
Live-generated AI content: This is where AI creates new content while you’re playing. Imagine NPCs that generate unique dialogue responses on the fly, or dynamic quests that change based on your actions. Because this content is unpredictable, Valve requires developers to build safety guardrails preventing illegal or offensive material from appearing.
AI That Doesn’t Need Disclosure
Efficiency tools: Code assistants, debugging software, AI-powered development tools. Valve explicitly says these don’t count. Their exact words: “Efficiency gains through the use of AI powered tools is not the focus of this section.”
This is a practical choice. Pretty much every piece of software developers use now has some AI baked in. Requiring disclosure for every AI-assisted autocomplete would be ridiculous.
Why Valve Drew This Line
Valve’s distinction targets player-facing AI content because that directly affects the consumer experience, while behind-the-scenes development tools (code assistants, debuggers) produce the same end result regardless of whether a human or AI wrote the code.
The distinction comes down to what players actually experience versus what happens behind the scenes.
If a developer uses AI to write code faster or debug their game, that doesn’t change what shows up on your screen. The game looks and plays the same whether a human typed every line of code or an AI assistant helped.
But if AI generated the art you’re looking at, the voice you’re hearing, or the dialogue you’re reading? That’s a different situation. You’re consuming AI-generated content directly, and some players want to know that.
For live AI content, there’s an extra wrinkle. Since the AI generates content in real-time, there’s no way to pre-screen everything. Valve’s solution: require developers to build guardrails and give players a way to report problems. Games without proper safeguards risk getting pulled from the store.
The Numbers Tell the Story
Around 8,000 Steam games disclosed AI use in the first half of 2025 alone, an 8x increase over the roughly 1,000 disclosures for all of 2024, and the actual number of AI-using titles is likely higher.
AI in gaming isn’t a future thing. It’s already here, and growing fast.
In the first half of 2025 alone, around 8,000 games on Steam disclosed some form of AI use. Compare that to 2024, when only about 1,000 games total had AI disclosures for the entire year. That’s an 8x jump in six months.
And those are just the games that voluntarily disclosed. The actual number using AI is probably higher.
Not Everyone Agrees
Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney argues AI disclosures are becoming meaningless because AI will soon touch nearly all game production, and the Epic Games Store currently has zero AI disclosure requirements.
Tim Sweeney, the CEO of Epic Games (Fortnite, Unreal Engine, Epic Games Store), thinks AI disclosures are becoming pointless.
His argument: AI will soon be involved in nearly all game production. Requiring labels for AI use would be like requiring labels for games that used a particular programming language. At some point, it becomes meaningless because everything uses it.
It’s a fair point, and it shows a real split in how the industry thinks about this. PC Gamer covered Sweeney’s position, noting that the Epic Games Store has no AI disclosure requirements at all.
My Take: Does It Actually Matter?
The Clair Obscur controversy at the Indie Game Awards proved that transparency matters more than AI use itself. The game lost its award not for using AI, but for lying about it.
Honestly? I’m with Sweeney on this one, at least partly.
If a game is entertaining, I don’t really care whether AI helped make it. What matters to me is my enjoyment of the game, not how it was created. A fun game is a fun game. A boring game is a boring game. The tools used to build it don’t change that.
That said, I get why disclosure matters to some people. We saw this play out dramatically with Clair Obscur at the Indie Game Awards. The game won Game of the Year, then had the award stripped because the developer initially denied using AI before admitting it. The kicker? The replacement winner also used AI. They just didn’t lie about it.
So maybe the real issue isn’t AI use itself. It’s transparency. People don’t like feeling deceived. If you’re upfront about your tools, most players will judge your game on its merits. Hide it, and you’ve got a problem.
Valve’s updated rules seem to understand this. They’re not trying to ban AI or shame developers for using it. They just want players to know what they’re getting.
What This Means for You
Gamers get clearer store page disclosures about player-facing AI content, and developers get a bright line: use AI tools freely behind the scenes, but label anything the player directly sees, hears, or interacts with.
If you’re a gamer, these changes give you better information. Store pages will show disclosures for player-facing AI content, so you can make informed decisions about what you play. The guardrail requirements for live AI should also reduce the chances of running into weird or offensive AI-generated content.
If you’re curious about AI tools beyond gaming, check out my guide to getting started with AI in everyday life.
If you’re a developer (or thinking about becoming one with tools like Lovable), the rules are clearer now. Use AI to code faster, debug smarter, and prototype quicker without worrying about disclosure. Just be upfront about any AI that creates player-facing content, and build proper safeguards for anything that generates content live.
Frequently Asked Questions About Steam AI Disclosure Rules
Do all games on Steam have AI now?
Not all, but AI use is growing fast. About 8,000 games disclosed AI in the first half of 2025, compared to 1,000 for all of 2024. The actual number is likely higher since disclosure is only required for certain types of AI use.
What happens if a developer doesn’t disclose AI properly?
Games can be removed from Steam. Valve also added a reporting system so players can flag potentially problematic AI-generated content in games with live AI features.
How can I tell if a game uses AI?
Check the Steam store page. Games with AI-generated content will have a disclosure section explaining what parts of the game use AI. Arc Raiders, for example, shows a clear AI content disclosure.
Does using ChatGPT to help write game dialogue require disclosure?
If that dialogue ships with the game (pre-generated), yes. If the AI generates dialogue live during gameplay, that also needs disclosure plus safety guardrails. But using AI to help brainstorm ideas that a human then rewrites? That’s a gray area Valve’s rules don’t specifically address.
The Bottom Line
Valve’s updated Steam AI disclosure rules create the clearest framework for AI transparency in gaming, drawing a practical line between behind-the-scenes tools and player-facing generated content.
Valve’s updated Steam AI disclosure rules strike a reasonable balance. Developers get clarity on what does and doesn’t need disclosure, and players get transparency about the AI-generated content they’re actually consuming.
Whether you think AI disclosures will matter five years from now (Sweeney doesn’t) or believe they’re an important consumer protection (Valve does), these updated rules are the clearest framework we have for AI transparency in gaming right now.
For more on how AI is changing creative industries, check out my post on AI-generated YouTube content and whether viewers actually care.
Leave a Reply