AI music tools are letting anyone create songs. Type a prompt into Suno, and you get a full track with vocals, instruments, and production in seconds. No musical training required. No expensive studio. No years of practice.
This sounds like democratization. And technically, it is. But the reality of what’s happening to music in 2025 is stranger and more troubling than either the utopian or dystopian narratives suggest.
The quick answer: AI music tools like Suno and Udio are letting non-musicians create songs that get millions of streams. But 50,000 AI songs are uploaded daily, 97% of listeners can’t tell the difference, and artists could lose 24% of their income by 2028. The music industry is being flooded with content that sounds professional but was created in seconds by people who can’t play an instrument.
The Scale of AI Music in 2025
The numbers are staggering.
According to Deezer, 50,000 AI-generated songs are uploaded to streaming platforms every day. That’s 34% of all music submissions. And when the company surveyed 9,000 people across eight countries, 97% couldn’t distinguish AI-generated tracks from human-composed ones.
AI music is already hitting the charts. Billboard reports that AI-powered act Breaking Rust debuted at No. 9 on the emerging artists chart and later hit No. 1 on Country Digital Song Sales. “A Million Colors” by Vinih Pray, created with Suno, made the TikTok Viral 50.
Blow Records, which only released their first track in June 2025, became the highest-earning AI-generated artist on Spotify. Their hit “Predador de Perereca” spawned 1.6 million TikTok videos after going viral.
The Democratization Argument
Platforms like Boomy, Suno, and Udio argue they’re democratizing music creation. The pitch is straightforward: why should musical expression be limited to people with years of training, expensive equipment, and industry connections?
Cassie Speer from Boomy highlighted that AI tools can help marginalized communities who lack access to music education. Someone without piano lessons or studio time can now create a full song by describing what they want.
Recording Academy CEO Harvey Mason Jr. recently said that “every” songwriter and producer he knows has used AI music tools. Even professionals are using Suno to generate ideas when they’re stuck.
There’s something genuinely appealing about this vision. Music is a fundamental human instinct. Scientists have speculated that early humans may have sung before they developed language. Why should creating music require gatekeepers?
The Problem with “Democratization”
Here’s where the story gets uncomfortable.
When everyone can create music in seconds, what happens to the people who spent years learning to do it well? A study estimates that by 2028, music creators could see 24% of their revenues at risk from AI substitution. AI-generated music is projected to account for 20% of streaming platform revenues.
Over 200 artists, including Billie Eilish and Stevie Wonder, have signed an open letter urging protections against AI misuse. Three-quarters of music producers now fear AI could replace human creators.
And there’s the copyright issue. AI music models learn from millions of songs scraped from the internet without artists’ permission. In 2024, the major labels (Universal, Sony, Warner) sued Suno and Udio for alleged mass copyright infringement, seeking up to $150,000 per infringed work.
Suno admitted in court filings that it trained on “tens of millions” of recordings from the “open Web,” including copyrighted material. They claimed it was legal under fair use. The labels disagreed.
The Settlements Changed Everything
The lawsuits didn’t go to trial. Instead, the major labels cut deals.
According to Billboard, Udio reached agreements with Universal and Warner in October and November 2025. The settlement requires Udio to pivot from generating new music to becoming a “fan engagement platform” where users remix existing songs. They’ve already removed the download button.
Suno’s deal with Warner, announced November 25, 2025, is different. Suno can keep doing what it does, but must train on licensed music and charge users to download tracks.
What does this mean? The AI music tools that promised democratization are now partnering with the same major labels that have always controlled the music industry. The gatekeepers aren’t gone. They’re just collecting rent from the new tools.
What This Means for You
If you’ve been curious about AI music tools, here’s the honest picture:
You can create music now. Tools like Suno let you make surprisingly good songs by typing a description. It’s genuinely fun, and the results can be impressive.
Monetization is getting harder. Streaming platforms are cracking down on AI-generated content. A viral Suno song was removed from platforms and re-released with human vocals. If you want to make money, expect friction.
The tools are changing fast. Udio’s pivot to fan engagement instead of music creation shows how quickly the rules can shift. What works today might not work tomorrow.
Human musicians aren’t going anywhere. Despite the hype, live music, authentic artistry, and the human stories behind songs still matter to listeners. AI can generate sounds, but it can’t generate meaning.
The Honest Take
The “democratization” framing is both true and misleading.
Yes, anyone can now create music that sounds professional. That’s genuinely new. A 10-year-old with a laptop can make a track that, sonically, rivals major-label releases.
But flooding streaming platforms with 50,000 AI songs per day doesn’t create more meaningful music. It creates more noise. It makes it harder for human artists to get heard. And it raises serious questions about what we actually value in music.
Is a song valuable because it sounds good? Or because a human being poured their experience, emotion, and skill into creating it?
AI music tools are forcing us to answer that question. And the answer will shape what music looks like for the next generation.
Common Questions About AI Music
Can I tell if a song was made by AI?
Probably not. Studies show 97% of listeners can’t distinguish AI-generated music from human-composed tracks. The technology is already that good.
Is AI music legal?
It’s complicated. Creating AI music for personal use is generally fine. Monetizing it on streaming platforms is increasingly restricted. The major labels have settled lawsuits that limit how AI tools can operate commercially.
Will AI replace human musicians?
For some applications, yes. Background music, stock music, and generic content will increasingly be AI-generated. For meaningful artistic expression, human musicians will remain valued, but may earn less as AI floods the market.
Related Reading
Want to understand how AI is changing creative industries? Check out these articles:
AI YouTube Channels: The Truth About Faceless Content — Another creative industry facing AI disruption
McDonald’s AI Christmas Ad Backlash — When AI-generated creative work goes wrong
Start Here — New to AI? Begin with our beginner guides.
Leave a Reply